This tool is designed to help you choose an approach to demonstrate the value or impact of your knowledge and library service.

Use these examples to identify what you are going to measure and for whom.

Achieve maximum impact by using the Making Alignment a Priority (MAP) toolkit to explore how to align library and knowledge services to your organisation’s goals.

Use the worked examples to find appropriate tools, using this approach.

  1. Decide what you are going to measure or demonstrate. 
  2. Decide who the value and impact stakeholder is.
  3. Choose a method and tool that measures what you want.

Case studies

Impact of literature search service on patient care

What is the reason for their interest?

Stakeholder 1 (user) wants information to make a decision about a diagnosis and treatment of a patient.

Stakeholder 2 (Library Manager) wants to know if the increase in literature search requests contributes to patient care.

Stakeholder 3 (Trust Management) wants to know if literature searches and the library contribute impact on actual patient care.

What is their desired outcome?

Stakeholder 1 (User) wants the relevant information as quickly as possible.

Stakeholder 2 (Library Manager) wants knowledge about the library contribution to patient care.

Stakeholder 3 (Trust Manager) wants knowledge about the library contribution to patient care.

What are our possible measures or metrics? 

For the desired outcome of stakeholder 1 (User) we need to measure the relevance of information, the speed of its delivery, and its impact on diagnosis or treatment decision.

For the desired outcome of stakeholder 2 (Library Manager) and Stakeholder 3 (Trust Manager) we need to measure the impact of the information provided on diagnosis or treatment decision.

What can they be measured by?

For all 3 stakeholders surveys and interviews using critical incident technique can be used to measure the impact of the information.

For the outcomes desired by stakeholder 1 (User) output (performance) data can also be measured.

Value of the library service

What is the reason for their interest? 

Stakeholder 1 (Library User) wants information to make a decision about the treatment of a patient.

Stakeholder 2 (Library Service Manager) wants to provide high quality service.

Stakeholder 3 (Trust Management) wants to know if the library is providing value for money.

What is their desired outcome? 

Stakeholder 1 (Library User) wants relevant information delivered as quickly as possible.

Stakeholder 2 (Library Service Manager) wants a high quality service.

Stakeholder 3 (Trust Management) wants a cost effective library service that contributes to organisational objective.

What are our possible measures or metrics? 

For the desired outcome of stakeholder 1 (Library User) we need to measure the relevance of information and the speed of delivery.

For the desired outcome of stakeholder 2 ( Library Manager) we need to use quality assurance measures and benchmarking standards.

For the desired outcome of stakeholder 3 (Trust Management) we should measure costs and return on investment (ROI).

What can they be measured by?

For the desired outcomes of stakeholder 1 (Library User) we can use a user satisfaction survey , an interview, or output (Performance) Data.

For the Desired outcomes of stakeholder 2 (Library Manager) we can use quality and improvement outcomes, or balanced scorecard.

For the desired outcomes of stakeholder 3 (Trust Management) we can use cost effectivenessROI, or balanced scorecard.

Effectiveness of training

What is the reason for their interest? 

Stakeholder 1 (User) wants to be able to find evidence for themselves quickly.

Stakeholder 2 (Trainer) wants to determine the best methods of teaching.

Stakeholder 3 (Library Manager) wants to determine whether 1 to 1 teaching sessions are the best use of library time.

What is their desired outcome? 

Stakeholder 1 (User) wants to know where to look, how to be confident in using electronic resources, the ability to print out information, and to save searches.

Stakeholder 2 (Trainer) wants confident users who regularly use resources to find what they want and need.

Stakeholder 3 (Library Manager) wants to know the costs of training compared to other methods and the value of the training to the organisation.

What are our possible measures or metrics? 

For the desired outcomes of Stakeholder 1 (User) possible measures could be the use of the learned skills and their perceived confidence.

For the desired outcomes of Stakeholder 2 (Trainer) possible measures could be the use of learned skills, their perceived confidence, and their ability to find evidence.

For the desired outcomes of Stakeholder 3 (Library Manager) we might want to measure whether the skills learned in training are used, how these learned skills are used, the cost of training versus mediated search, and the feasibility of providing group rather than 1 to 1 training.

What can they be measured by? 

To measure the desired outcomes of stakeholder 1 (User) we might process the data (such as the number of log on to resources) or a survey.

To measure the desired outcomes of stakeholder 2 (Trainer) we might process the data (such as the number of log on to resources) or a survey, or a test of skills.

To measure the desired outcomes of stakeholder 3 (Library Manager ) we might process the data (such as the number of log on to resources), an impact surveycost effectiveness, or interviews with trainees and library staff providing training.

Contact the Knowledge for Healthcare team with comments and feedback.

Page last reviewed: 11 September 2023
Next review due: 11 September 2024